Manus.ai, https://go.wm-tips.com/manusfree, makes mistakes. So do all the AI tools, which is why people who slap AI generated content online by copy paste will get Google Slammed. Google doesn’t mind you using AI, after all, they do. But they have always been focused on the user experience. If the content is crappy, they will reject it faster than John West. The mistakes I found were in the HTML edition of the book it wrote, and it had to do with the code. It has always been an issue that books about writing code didn’t always have examples that worked. It’s a challenge because the author can’t control the user’s computer or their setup. Except, we did in this book. We settled on a working environment and gave instructions on how to set it up. The code should have worked in that environment. It did from the PDF, but not the HTML. It turned out that the error was in the way Manus translated the markdown documents to HTML, or perhaps the way the web browser interpreted it. Regardless, it needed fixing. After a day of editing everything is working correctly. Let that be a lesson to me. Always check the output from an AI tool. Regards, |
Where the marketing is easy.
