Google’s stance on AI-generated content is pragmatic and clear. As long as AI-generated articles adhere to the platform’s guidelines for helpful content, they are not restricted from ranking in search results. Google’s primary focus remains on the quality of content, its relevance, and user intent rather than the method of creation. Their stance is clear, the content must be good and provide value to the reader for it to rank. From some of the pages I’ve read Humans are perfectly capable of writing less than stellar content. In general, AI written content is about mid range for all the content online. That’s really where you’d expect it to be because it has been trained on as much online content as it can find. What you’ll get is average content, Doh! But you can make the AI output much, much better. There’s a couple of ways of doing that. Probably the easiest is to use NotebookLM in conjunction with a Google search. Grab the top ten results and ask NotebookLM to write an article that covers everything the top ten do and what they don’t cover for that keyword. Feed that through Grammarly to tidy it up and check for plagiarism and you’re good to post. The second easiest is to use Insight Analyser to find the relevant questions and build pages by answering those. The built-in AI tools will write you a great page that will rank. You may like to edit it before posting, but that’s optional. If you want to go it alone you can always create your own prompts to use in ChatGPT, Claude, CoPilot, etc. and ask for the content to be humanised. What is important here is that you might as well use the tools available to help your marketing rather than sticking with the way things have always been done. Not too many people insist on walking everywhere these days, they much prefer some form of transport for speed and efficiency. Talking about that, I’ve managed to ride my $100 bicycle over 10,000 km now. Now that’s what I call a great ROI. The next target is 10,000 miles, I’m just over 60% of the way. Regards, |